RL34391
Coast Guard Polar Icebreaker Modernization: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress
May 29, 2009

Download Locations

Summary

Of the Coast Guards three polar icebreakers, twoPolar Star and Polar Seahave exceeded their intended 30-year service lives. The Polar Star is not operational and has been in caretaker status since July 1, 2006. A 2007 report from the National Research Council (NRC) on the U.S. polar icebreaking fleet states that U.S. [polar] icebreaking capability is now at risk of being unable to support national interests in the north and the south. On July 16, 2008, Admiral Thad Allen, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, testified that: Today, our nation is at a crossroads with Coast Guard domestic and international icebreaking capabilities. We have important decisions to make. And I believe we must address our icebreaking needs now.... The Coast Guard is studying how many polar icebreakers, with what capabilities, should be procured as replacements for Polar Star and Polar Sea. Under the Coast Guards current schedule, the first replacement polar icebreaker might enter service in 8 to 10 years, by which time Polar Star and Polar Sea could be about 40 years old. The Coast Guard estimated in February 2008 that new replacement ships might cost $800 million to $925 million each in 2008 dollars, and that the alternative of extending the service lives of Polar Sea and Polar Star for 25 years might cost about $400 million per ship. The FY2009 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations act (Division D of H.R. 2638/P.L. 110-329 of September 30, 2008) provided $30.3 million to reactivate Polar Star for 7 to 10 years of service life. The Coast Guards proposed FY2010 budget does not request any funding in the services Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements (AC&I) account for polar icebreaker sustainment, or for acquisition of new polar icebreakers. Potential policy issues for Congress regarding Coast Guard polar icebreaker modernization include the numbers and capabilities of polar icebreakers the Coast Guard will need in the future; whether to provide these icebreakers through construction of new ships or service life extensions of Polar Start and/or Polar Sea; whether to accelerate the Coast Guards current schedule for acquiring replacement ships; whether new ships should be nuclear powered; whether new ships should be funded entirely in the Coast Guard budget, or partly or entirely in some other part of the federal budget, such as the Department of Defense (DOD) budget, the National Science Foundation (NSF) budget, or both; and whether, as an interim measure, the Polar Star should be repaired and placed back into service. Congresss options regarding Coast Guard polar icebreaker modernization include but are not limited to the following: approving the Coast Guards current plan; holding hearings to solicit additional information on the issue; directing the Coast Guard to include the option of nuclear power in its studies of requirements for future icebreakers; directing the Coast Guard to pursue a particular acquisition strategy for icebreaker modernization; accelerating the procurement of new icebreakers relative to the Coast Guards current plan; funding the procurement of new icebreakers partly or entirely in the DOD and/or NSF budget rather than entirely the Coast Guard budget; and directing the Coast Guard to reactivate Polar Star. This report will be updated as events warrant.

    Related Legislation:
  • H.R.2638

XML